The cold and detached father in Jiangsu sees someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him Do not suspect the drowned ones are oneself son

The cold and detached father in Jiangsu sees someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him Do not suspect the drowned ones are oneself son
The cold and detached father in Jiangsu sees someone in mortal danger without lifting a finger to save him Do not suspect the drowned ones are oneself son
Son's drowned life hung the first line, he thought that was a child of others' family, have chosen cold and detachedly to leave, learnt drowned already repenting late when being oneself son finally. Afterwards, unexpectedly this father blames the son's death to the residents committee of the community on one's body, and go to the court to sue and require the other side to compensate, is rejected by the court finally. Yesterday, the intermediate people's court of Wuxi announced " ten major model cases of court of Wuxi of 2011 years " ,This get up " the the intersection of somebody and the intersection of body and dispute case of compensation for damage Yao " Not only selected " Ten is big " ,And occupy because the common people of great impact of the society pay close attention to degree high " The first place in a contest " . Will it be will it be will it be about 6 o'clock evening June 27 2010, so-and-so, such and such the intersection of son and Yao (6 year old) Xing Yao Fall into water when one rents the small quay of river of the community in the residence to play alone. So-and-so Yao learns that there is a child that falls into water, have not entered the water to rescue immediately, after he goes home without finding the son, return to and meet accident the river just now, find a drowned one is exactly oneself son, save the son from water, but late, the child has been already drowned and dead. Afterwards, so-and-so Yao, so-and-so Xing have not tried the security voluntarily and litigated with the residents committee of the community, and damage and conciliate gold, funeral expenses, rescue the fee etc. and total more than 470,000 yuan in the claim son's death damages, spirit. Tried and thought by the court, the river where so-and-so Yao's son meets accident, the local village committee is not a legal caretaker, have no fault for the child's drowned death, do not bear responsibility. River caretaker facility around to river set up and management deficient, have already tried the general security obligation, should not bear responsibility. The appellant so-and-so Yao and his wife have obvious fault, should bear corresponding responsibility. In view of the above, the court rejects the claims of so-and-so Yao couple in accordance with the law.


|