Food security dispute that can not be withdrawn from forever
Food security dispute that can not be withdrawn from forever
Gather cyanogen amine and just disappear and stop three times, brightening agent has come again. Use the brightening agent for 20 years in the Chinese flour, is meant admitting that there is " carcinogenic function by some experts, countries such as European Union,etc. have already forbidden " . Excessive in the ordinary flour will destroy the micro- nutrient such as being sour of middle period of flour to add brightening agent, the liver which increases people is born. Add brightening agent in flour compatriot strange, Tengxun network show in the intersection of news and an investigation gone on on the same day to expose, 42. 55% of the netizens all know that contain brightening agent in the flour. But so for many years, what we should eat or eating. Compare to " Whether contain brightening agent in the flour " Worry but speech, that last compatriot panic is,brightening agent like refered at " the toxicology " really, it is not merely that one kind urges the cancer thing, also initiate cancer function at the same time? Is the flour which has added brightening agent harmful to the human body on earth? This one is disputed long-drawn-out, let the person think over, a plurality of ministries and commissions such as national grains bureau, State Bureau of Quality Testing, the Ministry of Agriculture,etc. insist on maintaining that forbid the flour to add brightening agent, only Ministry of Public Health has put forward a great deal of and objected to the reason to forbid. Don't blame the public have a partiality for negative to imagine the intersection of flour and first play of news that brightening agent disputed, we would like to stand and come up to this harmful party's position of brightening agent. " it is the biggest problem to have a meal " ,Whether could have enough the era of the meal, the safe problem that we pay attention to having a meal even more now. Perhaps, the lasting dispute of several big ministries and commissions and Ministry of Public Health is exactly based on the consideration more responsible to the public, but the most key problem is now, the both side of disputants are extremely authoritative departments in the public mind, whether there is battle of interests inside, have not mentioned in the news, the greatest difficult problem is left to the public, which statement of party is science responsible for the public on earth? Will position of the party go up where we will stand? In wondering very heavily, is the flour eaten or does not eat on earth? Return one step more analyzing, it is the media that is making " flour trust crisis " through according with the news clue of audience's psychology Gag? Expert of ones that give an interview either person who really exists, or the statement of authoritative ministries and commissions, impossible make the fake to the extensive query of brightening agent in the flour. In fact, on the judgement of the food security question, we should choose to act as and break broken but not ceaseless dispute even more. From oil of underground drainage to clenobuterol hydrochloride, gather cyanogen amine from three to various additive, from milk power to egg, the food security issue of China has already brought a shade that can not erase to the public, " would rather believe it has, incredible it does not have " " guilty inference " of the type Have already become the public's unconscious choice of treating food security. In order to disperse the doubt in the public heart as soon as possible, on brightening agent of flour at least, the national related departments must provide the clear statement. It is likewise in the above-mentioned investigation of Tengxun net, 73. 75% of the netizens have doubts, 67 to China's food security. 80% of the netizens say that does not dare to eat the flour again. Some more or less conclusions investigated are exaggerative. But the one that can affirm is, so long as the public can't resume confidence to China's food security, the dispute about the food security problem will also exist within a very long time. If never stop as dispute of brightening agent of flour, then we can only choose helplessly numbly on food security, but food is god for the people, the meal must always be eaten.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment